- Anthropology, Archaeology, Cultural Anthropology, Zooarchaeology, Archaeometry, Lithic Technology, and 26 moreTaphonomy, Lithics, Neanderthals (Palaeolithic Archaeology), Paleolithic Europe, Middle to Upper Paleolithic Transition, Bone and Antler, Mousterian, Early Upper Paleolithic technocomplex (Archaeology), Middle Paleolithic, Bone Technology (Archaeology), Residue and Use-Wear Analysis, 3D Scan modelling & Analysis, Archaeology and Anthropology, Prehistory, Prehistoric Technology, Middle Palaeolithic, Bone Tools, Neandertals, Cantabrian Palaeolithic, Experimental Archaeology, Palaeolithic Archaeology, Russia, Human evolutionary genetics, Traceology, Flintknapping, and Archaeological Site Formation Processesedit
- My PhD was about Upper Pleistocene Neanderthal societies and economies, focused on the study of bone tools and the an... moreMy PhD was about Upper Pleistocene Neanderthal societies and economies, focused on the study of bone tools and the antropic use of hard tissues like antler, bone and teeth. More recently, I've been working in Neolithic bone tools, specially on funerary contexts. As a technician of the Department of Archaeology & Anthropology I deal with archaeological field work, artifact databases, 3D scanning & modelling and 3D photogrammetry. I'm also trained in use-wear analisys with optic microscopy (both low and high magnification devices). For many years, I’ve been working also in science dissemination. I’ve worked via blogs, social media, direct actions and with my participation in projects from science dissemination institutions like FECYT.edit
Research Interests:
Patricia Martín Rodríguez, Millán Mozota
Ganaderos neolíticos en el Pirineo
Monografies del MAC 2, Barcelona 2018,
ISBN: 978-84-393-9811-0 (PÀG. 225-233)
Ganaderos neolíticos en el Pirineo
Monografies del MAC 2, Barcelona 2018,
ISBN: 978-84-393-9811-0 (PÀG. 225-233)
Research Interests:
This paper presents a critical review of the experimental works with bone retouchers that have been pub lished since the beginning of research about this type of tool. The aim of this review is not the recollection of references per se,... more
This paper presents a critical review of the experimental works with bone retouchers that have been pub lished since the beginning of research about this type of tool. The aim of this review is not the recollection of references per se, but a critical evaluation of different studies. This critical synthesis will show where we are today from a theoretical and methodological point of view. A number of ideas on how to improve and expand the scientific research about retouchers will be proposed together with a range of open archaeolo gical and experimental issues, which can be addressed by the research community in the years ahead.
Citation: MOZOTA, M. (2017 in press): "Experimental programmes with retouchers: Where do we stand and where do we go now?". In Hutson, J.M., García-Moreno, A., Turner, E., Villaluenga, A., Gaudzinski-Windheuser, S. (Eds.), 2017. The Origins of Bone Tool Technologies. Römisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum, Mainz.
Citation: MOZOTA, M. (2017 in press): "Experimental programmes with retouchers: Where do we stand and where do we go now?". In Hutson, J.M., García-Moreno, A., Turner, E., Villaluenga, A., Gaudzinski-Windheuser, S. (Eds.), 2017. The Origins of Bone Tool Technologies. Römisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum, Mainz.
Research Interests:
In this paper, we analyze four assemblages of bone retouchers that were collected on an equal number of Mousterian sites located in northern Iberia: Peña Miel (La Rioja), Covalejos (Cantabria), Morín (Cantabria) and Prado Vargas (Burgos).... more
In this paper, we analyze four assemblages of bone retouchers that were collected on an equal number of Mousterian sites located in northern Iberia: Peña Miel (La Rioja), Covalejos (Cantabria), Morín (Cantabria) and Prado Vargas (Burgos). From the analysis of 260 bone retouchers, the results of a study covering taphonomical, morphometrics and use-wear approaches are presented. We study all the archaeological materials from both a quantitative and qualitative perspective, but we do not limit our inferential tools to archaeological artifacts: our technical analysis is also based on an extended experimental program that comprised 177 experiments of retouch. The ultimate goal of our holistic approach is to understand the retouchers’ role within the subsistence systems of the neanderthals. The study, together with the contextual archaeological information, allows us to explain how the bone retouchers integrate with various productive areas of neanderthal economy. We can confirm that these tools become key pieces of economic management, bridging different subsistence areas. In particular, the retouchers highlight a bridge between two key areas: the collection and management of animal resources, and the management of mineral resources (stone tools). Then, while retouchers are not very elaborated tools, they cannot be considered "fortune" or adhoc tools, because the strategies for the production and management of these valuable bone implements are not improvised or left to chance. They respond to a series of criteria that are common to the different studied assemblages. These shared features suggest a structural similarity between the groups when configuring the management of their tools. But at the same time, at least two aspects of variability were found: (1) a flexibility in the performed tasks, which probably has to do with the specific demands of lithic retouch; and (2) some diversity in how to maintain and refit the bone tools, which may be related to cultural practices or traditions of the groups.
Research Interests:
Here I present two experimental programs, which are in different stages of development. The first item is an already finished experimental program about the collection and use of retouching tools made on macro mammal diaphyseal fragments.... more
Here I present two experimental programs, which are in different stages of development. The first item is an already finished experimental program about the collection and use of retouching tools made on macro mammal diaphyseal fragments. The second is an ongoing program on the use of unmodified bone diaphyseal fragments to work hide and wood. Both programs are directly related to the archaeological evidence found in a series of Middle Palaeolithic sites in the North of the Iberian Peninsula.
Research Interests:
We present an experimental program about the collection and use of retouching tools made on macromammal diaphyseal fragments. It stems from the need of studying a number of ensembles of bone tools from mousterian deposits of the central... more
We present an experimental program about the collection and use of retouching tools made on macromammal diaphyseal fragments. It stems from the need of studying a number of ensembles of bone tools from mousterian deposits of the central sector of the NW of the Iberian Peninsula. It is suggested as a methodological tool for the understanding of the technical and technological role of bone tools in Middle Palaeolithic.
Research Interests:
Note: THIS PAPER IS OPEN ACCESS NOW. The present work presents the results of 38 experiments of bone fragmentation and blank collection, together with 177 experiments of retouch. In the first series of experiments, the fragmentation step... more
Note: THIS PAPER IS OPEN ACCESS NOW. The present work presents the results of 38 experiments of bone fragmentation and blank collection, together with 177 experiments of retouch. In the first series of experiments, the fragmentation step was executed by massive percussion using macro-lithic tools. The goal was to study the fragmentation stigmas and the traits of products and by-products. In the retouching experiments, the bone blanks were used to retouch flint and quartzite, and the goal was to study the formation and development of use traces.
Research Interests:
This paper presents the analysis of 150 retouching tools. They are diaphisis bone splinters from the long limb bones of ungulates. They were found in level “D” at Axlor (Dima, Vizcaya), which corresponds to the last stages of Mousterian... more
This paper presents the analysis of 150 retouching tools. They are diaphisis bone splinters from the long limb bones of ungulates. They were found in level “D” at Axlor (Dima, Vizcaya), which corresponds to the last stages of Mousterian period (about 44000 BP). This level contains an abundance of Quina-type side scrapers. The study combines different approaches (taphonomy, technology, traceology and experimentation) within an structure of operational sequence analysis. The role of “sparsely elaborated” tools in neanderthals disability models, and their informative potential about Middle Palaeolithic societies, are discused.
Research Interests:
I present a critical review of the evidence on bone tools from Lower and Middle Paleolithic in Europe, and also on the so-called “less elaborated” tools from Upper Paleolithic and recent Prehistory. Such review and its results produce a... more
I present a critical review of the evidence on bone tools from Lower and Middle Paleolithic in Europe, and also on the so-called “less elaborated” tools from Upper Paleolithic and recent Prehistory. Such review and its results produce a number of relevant considerations to explain the appearance of the “bone industry” in Europe, in the beginnings of Upper Paleolithic. It also permits to suggest some hypotheses about the possible reasons behind this occurrence.
Research Interests:
Este trabajo de investigación presenta los resultados de un estudio sobre el utillaje óseo de los niveles B-C-D de Axlor (Dima, Bizkaia), que se corresponden con la parte superior de la secuencia Musteriense del yacimiento. El nivel B... more
Este trabajo de investigación presenta los resultados de un estudio sobre el utillaje óseo de los niveles B-C-D de Axlor (Dima, Bizkaia), que se corresponden con la parte superior de la secuencia Musteriense del yacimiento. El nivel B está datado en 42010±1280 BP por 14C (45670±1210 calibrado BP). Se trata de niveles del final del Musteriense, con evidencias arqueológicas que corresponden a las últimas sociedades neandertales europeas. Los útiles de hueso hallados en los estratos B-C-D son, en su mayor parte, retocadores en esquirlas diafisiárias de grandes ungulados. Este tipo de utillaje fue utilizado en las tareas de fabricación y reavivado de las herramientas de piedra. En menor número, aparece un tipo de útil que hemos denominado "alisador", a modo de hipótesis funcional. También se ha documentado, en el nivel C, una herramienta "doble", retocador y "cincel".
Research Interests:
The retouching bone tools are characteristic items from european middle Paleolithic assemblages, so are they related with stone knapping. They are present in many sites from France, central-east Europe, and also the Iberian Peninsula.... more
The retouching bone tools are characteristic items from european middle Paleolithic assemblages, so are they related with stone knapping. They are present in many sites from France, central-east Europe, and also the Iberian Peninsula. These tools have a wide chronological spawn, whose examples cover from the oldest european middle Palaeolithic, until the final stages of this period (c. 40.000 BP). The bone tools came from Middle Paleolithic sites, but also are present in recent prehistory ambients. An experimental approach is taken, that includes all the stages of bone processing: obtaining of the bone blanks (from fresh bones and/or old bones), using them, and discarding the tools. We got the archaeological reference of the retouching tools obtained in Axlor site’s modern excavations. This Mousterian site has levels with Quina-type side-scrappers and knapping techniques, and also other levels with really different kinds of stone tools. The site has provided an extensive assemblage of retouching bone tools. This paper describes the main lines of experimental program, and the results of the first phase, the one about blank obtaining.
Research Interests:
La industria en hueso del Paleolítico medio es una realidad compleja, que requiere de un enfoque distinto al aplicado hasta el momento, heredero de los estudios del Paleolítico superior. La existencia de esta clase de utillaje en hueso, a... more
La industria en hueso del Paleolítico medio es una realidad compleja, que requiere de un enfoque distinto al aplicado hasta el momento, heredero de los estudios del Paleolítico superior. La existencia de esta clase de utillaje en hueso, a menudo llamado “poco elaborado”, es una realidad constatada en numerosos yacimientos de Paleolítico medio. Debido a inercias investigadoras, dicho utillaje no ha recibido la atención debida, para comprender su dimensión económica y social, en las actividades cotidianas de los grupos neandertales. El yacimiento de Paleolítico medio de Axlor (Dima, Bizkaia) ha proporcionado un conjunto de útiles en hueso, en el marco de las excavaciones en curso. Este trabajo presenta el estudio de un útil óseo de doble función, hallado en el nivel C –Musteriense– de Axlor. Dicho útil se utilizó a modo de “cincel”, en tareas que implican movimientos de percusión y flexión, y –asimismo– como retocador, para trabajar la industria lítica. El análisis realizadocombina aspectos tafonómicos, morfométricos y traceológicos (huellas de uso), para ofrecer una visión tecnológica de la obtención y utilización del soporte. Se ha establecido un desarrollo diacrónico para los trabajos que fueron realizados con el útil (una esquirla alargada y plana de húmero de Bos/Bison). La utilización como “cincel” se interrumpe con la fractura del extremo proximal del soporte, y el uso como retocador es posterior.
Research Interests:
Se presentan cuatro fragmentos de hueso, de los niveles de Paleolítico Medio de la cueva de Axlor, con huellas de uso en tareas repetitivas. Esos trabajos provocaron la abrasión y pulido de las zonas activas, lo que ha permitido su... more
Se presentan cuatro fragmentos de hueso, de los niveles de Paleolítico Medio de la cueva de Axlor, con huellas de uso en tareas repetitivas. Esos trabajos provocaron la abrasión y pulido de las zonas activas, lo que ha permitido su identificación como utillaje. Los objetos se han denominado "alisadores", a modo de hipótesis funcional. La naturaleza precisa de las labores realizadas no puede concretarse, en este estadio de la investigación, haciéndose necesaria la elaboración de un programa experimental específico. Para situar los materiales en su contexto, se ofrece en primer lugar una breve síntesis de los trabajos realizados en el yacimiento Musteriense de Axlor.
Research Interests:
This paper analyzes the development of Middle Palaeolithic studies in Cantabria, from the first archaeological field work, until the present time. There is a criticism, related to the influence of different methodological and theoretical... more
This paper analyzes the development of Middle Palaeolithic studies in Cantabria, from the first archaeological field work, until the present time. There is a criticism, related to the influence of different methodological and theoretical traditions, and the archaeological praxis, on the interpretative models generated for the Cantabrian Mousterian. The sites and projects that are the main waypoints in the investigation are studied in detail. Those sites and studies are the foundations of Middle Palaeolithic interpretations for this region.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Description of Axlor site and the results of its excavations.
Research Interests:
Entre el 9 y el 11 de Noviembre de 2015 se celebró el V Seminario de Tecnología Prehistórica de la Institución Milá y Fontanals (IMF-CSIC) en Barcelona. En esta ocasión la temática fue el de las “Técnicas 3d para análisis de funcionalidad... more
Entre el 9 y el 11 de Noviembre de 2015 se celebró el V Seminario de Tecnología Prehistórica de la Institución Milá y Fontanals (IMF-CSIC) en Barcelona. En esta ocasión la temática fue el de las “Técnicas 3d para análisis de funcionalidad y tecnología en Prehistoria”. El seminario estaba destinado a alumnas y alumnos con una formación inicial o media en estas temáticas, como forma de introducción a estos campos de aplicación. Además, tuvo un carácter también práctico con demostraciones de las diferentes técnicas de digitalización 3D que se presentaron en el encuentro. La lengua vehicular principal del seminario fue el inglés y se pudo contar con un nutrido alumnado de procedencia internacional.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
The beginnings of experimental archaeology in Spain did not appear till the second part of the twentieth century, as opposed to other countries where its appearance took place in the nineteenth century (Nilsson 1868; Evans 1897; Lubbock... more
The beginnings of experimental archaeology in Spain did not appear till the second part of the twentieth century, as opposed to other countries where its appearance took place in the nineteenth century (Nilsson 1868; Evans 1897; Lubbock 1878, 561, Sellers 1886; McGuire 1891; Cushing 1894). However, during the last couple of decades, experimental archaeology in Spain has been a successful methodology used mainly for research purposes. The influence of the French is clear, and the evolution of experiments in archaeology follows the same trends in both countries.
Today, there is a clear tendency to apply experimentation not only to technoeconomical aspects but to socio-cultural processes, one aspect that is lacking from earlier applications. The creation of educational and public engagement centres has grown in recent years in our country. A clear example could also be found in the representation of centres in EXARC members map (exarc.net).
Today, there is a clear tendency to apply experimentation not only to technoeconomical aspects but to socio-cultural processes, one aspect that is lacking from earlier applications. The creation of educational and public engagement centres has grown in recent years in our country. A clear example could also be found in the representation of centres in EXARC members map (exarc.net).
Research Interests:
Presentación de charla divulgativa. Peesentation for Science Dissemination talk. Nota bene Material educativo. Imágenes de múltiples autores incluidas como Uso Legítimo. La PI y/o copyright son propiedad de cada autor/a individual y/o... more
Presentación de charla divulgativa.
Peesentation for Science Dissemination talk.
Nota bene
Material educativo. Imágenes de múltiples autores incluidas como Uso
Legítimo. La PI y/o copyright son propiedad de cada autor/a individual y/o
quienes ostentan el copyright. Esta presentación educativa no supone
ninguna declaración sobre esa cuestión.
Teaching material. Multiple author's images included under Fair Use. IP
and/or copyright is property of each individual author and/or copyright
holder. This educational presentation makes no statement on this aspect.
Check https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sobre_el_uso_legítimo
about Fair Use.
Peesentation for Science Dissemination talk.
Nota bene
Material educativo. Imágenes de múltiples autores incluidas como Uso
Legítimo. La PI y/o copyright son propiedad de cada autor/a individual y/o
quienes ostentan el copyright. Esta presentación educativa no supone
ninguna declaración sobre esa cuestión.
Teaching material. Multiple author's images included under Fair Use. IP
and/or copyright is property of each individual author and/or copyright
holder. This educational presentation makes no statement on this aspect.
Check https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sobre_el_uso_legítimo
about Fair Use.
Research Interests:
Material educativo. Imágenes de múltiples autores incluidas como Uso Legítimo. La PI y/o copyright son propiedad de cada autor/a individual y/o quienes ostentan el copyright. Esta presentación educativa no supone ninguna declaración sobre... more
Material educativo. Imágenes de múltiples autores incluidas como Uso Legítimo. La PI y/o copyright son propiedad de cada autor/a individual y/o quienes ostentan el copyright. Esta presentación educativa no supone ninguna declaración sobre esa cuestión. Teaching material. Multiple author's images included under Fair Use. IP and/or copyright is property of each individual author and/or copyright holder. This educational presentation makes no statement on this aspect. Check https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sobre_el_uso_legítimo about Fair Use.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
These are the slides of a presentation made during the International workshop: Retouching the Paleolithic.
Research Interests: Experimental Archaeology, Palaeolithic Archaeology, Bone and Antler, Paleolithic Europe, Neanderthals (Palaeolithic Archaeology), and 12 moreBone Technology (Archaeology), Lower and Middle Paleolithic, Middle Palaeolithic, Neandertals, Middle Paleolithic, Neanderthals, Neanderthal, Neandertales, Bone Tools, Neanderthal subsistence, Bone retouchers, and Neandertal
These are the slides of a presentation made during the International workshop: Retouching the Paleolithic.
Research Interests: Bone and Antler, Paleolithic Europe, Neanderthals (Palaeolithic Archaeology), Mousterian, Lower and Middle Paleolithic, and 11 moreMiddle Palaeolithic, Neandertals, Middle Paleolithic, Neanderthals, Paleolithic Archaeology, Neanderthal, Neandertales, Bone Tools, Neanderthal subsistence, Bone tools and Use-wear Analisys, and Musteriense
Presentación utilizada en una charla en la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona para alumnos/as del Grado de Arqueología.
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
On the origins of man (and woman!). Teaching material. Multiple author's images included under Fair Use. Check https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sobre_el_uso_legítimo about Fair Use. IP and/copyright is property of each individual... more
On the origins of man (and woman!). Teaching material. Multiple author's images included under Fair Use. Check https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sobre_el_uso_legítimo about Fair Use. IP and/copyright is property of each individual author and/or copyright holder. This Fair Use, educational presentation makes no statement on this aspect.
